From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Fabrizio

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 13, 1985
65 N.Y.2d 275 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued May 28, 1985

Decided June 13, 1985

John J. Hayden for petitioner. Alan W. Friedberg, Gerald Stern and Jean M. Savanyu for respondent.


The credible testimony establishes that petitioner, in the relatively short period that he has served as a Town Justice, engaged in numerous instances of egregious misconduct, including the seeking of special consideration for two defendants in other courts, using racial slurs, altering transcripts, advising his court reporter to change stenographic notes that had been subpoenaed by the Commission on Judicial Conduct, and sitting on a small claims case in which the defendant was his dentist for 10 years without disclosing the relationship or offering to disqualify himself. In addition, petitioner attempted to impede the Commission's investigative efforts throughout by falsifying evidence and intimidating witnesses.

Petitioner's actions violated numerous sections of the Rules Governing Judicial Conduct (22 N.Y.CRR 100.1, 100.2, 100.3 [a], [c]), the Code of Judicial Conduct (Canons 1, 2, 3 [A], [C]) and the Special Rules Concerning Court Decorum promulgated by the Appellate Division, Second Department (22 N.Y.CRR 700.5 [a], [e]). Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the fact that he is a nonlawyer is not a factor in mitigation. The Code of Judicial Conduct applies to "[a]nyone, whether or not a lawyer, who is an officer of a judicial system performing judicial functions" (Compliance With Code of Judicial Conduct, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 29, Appendix, p 539) and the Rules Governing Judicial Conduct should be similarly construed to further the objective of maintaining the "independent and honorable judiciary" which is "indispensible to justice in our society" (22 N.Y.CRR 100.1).

In short, petitioner has clearly abused the power of his office in a manner that has brought disrepute to the judiciary and damaged public confidence in the integrity of his court. This breach of public trust calls for the sanction of removal from office ( see, Matter of McGee v State Commn. on Judicial Conduct, 59 N.Y.2d 870).

Accordingly, the determined sanction of removal should be accepted, without costs.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, TITONE and BOOMER concur in Per Curiam opinion; Judge ALEXANDER taking no part.

Designated pursuant to N Y Constitution, article VI, § 2.

Determined sanction accepted, without costs, and Ronald L. Fabrizio is removed from his office of Justice of the New Windsor Town Court, Orange County.


Summaries of

Matter of Fabrizio

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 13, 1985
65 N.Y.2d 275 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Fabrizio

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RONALD L. FABRIZIO, a Justice of the New Windsor Town…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 13, 1985

Citations

65 N.Y.2d 275 (N.Y. 1985)
491 N.Y.S.2d 144
480 N.E.2d 733

Citing Cases

Matter of Roberts

Charges two and three are also sufficiently proven and disclose additional serious manifestations of lapses…

U.S. Bank v. Speller

Assuming arguendo that the Agreement would otherwise have implicated the Statute of Frauds (see, G.O.L. §§…