From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Eugene P

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1998
255 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 30, 1998

Appeal from the Family Court, Westchester County (Jamieson, J.).


Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency, we find that it was legally sufficient to support the fact-finding order ( see, Matter of David H., 69 N.Y.2d 792; Matter of Lamont D., 247 A.D.2d 615). Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the Family Court, as the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses ( see, Matter of Joseph J., 205 A.D.2d 776). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record ( see, Matter of Kwan M., 159 A.D.2d 707). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the findings of fact were not against the weight of the evidence ( cf., CPL 470.15; see, Matter of Sandy J., 246 A.D.2d 651).

The appellant's remaining contentions are either without merit or do not warrant reversal ( cf., People v. Clark, 155 A.D.2d 548).

Copertino, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Eugene P

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1998
255 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Eugene P

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EUGENE P., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 871