From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ennis v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 16, 1988
141 A.D.2d 933 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Summary

In Ennis, we upheld a determination that an inmate had committed an assault where the inmate had no physical contact with the correction officer but raised his hands with clenched fists and advanced toward the officer.

Summary of this case from Hop Wah v. Coughlin

Opinion

June 16, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Ulster County.


Petitioner was an inmate at Downstate Correctional Facility in Dutchess County when, on October 2, 1986, he was involved in an altercation with correction officers. As a result, he was administratively charged with assault. After a hearing, he was found guilty and was given a punishment of 20 days in a special housing unit and 60 days' loss of privileges. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination, and the proceeding has been transferred to this court for disposition.

Two correction officers testified that, during an argument with one of them, petitioner clenched his fists, raised his hands and advanced toward the officer. This fact was also supported by the testimony of an inmate. Petitioner and two other inmates testified that the correction officer initiated the incident. The rule petitioner was found to have violated states that "[i]nmates shall not assault, inflict or attempt to inflict bodily harm upon themselves or to any person". Matters of credibility are for the trier of fact to resolve (see, Matter of Perez v Wilmot, 67 N.Y.2d 615, 616-617), and the testimony of the correction officers, if believed, supports a finding of guilt. Thus, the determination is supported by substantial evidence.

We also reject petitioner's claim that he was not given adequate notice of the charge against him. The rule, while not a model of clarity, gives sufficient notice of what conduct is prohibited. Further, the misbehavior report sets forth the conduct which was alleged to have violated the rule.

We have reviewed the other contentions raised by petitioner and find them to be without merit.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Ennis v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 16, 1988
141 A.D.2d 933 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

In Ennis, we upheld a determination that an inmate had committed an assault where the inmate had no physical contact with the correction officer but raised his hands with clenched fists and advanced toward the officer.

Summary of this case from Hop Wah v. Coughlin
Case details for

Matter of Ennis v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MACIO ENNIS, Petitioner, v. T. COUGHLIN, as Commissioner…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1988

Citations

141 A.D.2d 933 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Hop Wah v. Coughlin

The test is whether a person of ordinary intelligence was provided fair notice by the rule (see, Matter of…

Matter of Toro v. Coughlin

Since the correction officer's testimony, if believes, provides substantial evidence in support of the…