From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Emmons v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 3, 1997
238 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

April 3, 1997


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

While a correction officer was randomly monitoring inmate telephone calls, he overheard petitioner, an inmate at Auburn Correctional Facility in Cayuga County, admit to assaulting two inmates. As a result of this information, petitioner was charged with, and found guilty of, violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits assaults on inmates.

We reject petitioner's contention that the determination was not supported by substantial evidence. Although respondent concedes that it was error for the Hearing Officer to have relied upon information provided by a confidential informant without making an independent assessment as to the informant's reliability, annulment of the determination is not required in light of the other evidence of petitioner's guilt ( see, Matter of Gardiner v. Senkowski, 234 A.D.2d 708; Matter of Hernandez v Coughlin, 206 A.D.2d 578, 579, appeal dismissed, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 1024). The detailed misbehavior report which included petitioner's admission of the assaults during his telephone conversation, together with, inter alia, the testimony of the correction officer who overheard the admission and authored the misbehavior report, constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination of petitioner's guilt ( see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964; Matter of Jones v. Selsky, 223 A.D.2d 990). Any conflict in the testimony given at the hearing raised credibility issues for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, supra, at 966). We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Mercure, Crew III and White, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Emmons v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 3, 1997
238 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Emmons v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALLEN EMMONS, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
656 N.Y.S.2d 967

Citing Cases

Matter of Pacheco v. Dufrain

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules which prohibit…

Matter of Mosley v. Goord

Although a Hearing Officer may not rely upon hearsay information provided by a confidential source without…