From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MATTER OF ELY

Supreme Court, Westchester Special Term
Jan 1, 1913
79 Misc. 118 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1913)

Opinion

January, 1913.

H.H. and W.L. Morse, for the petitioner.

Duer, Strong Whitehead, for the respondents.


The question in this proceeding is whether an attorney can assert and enforce a lien for his services and disbursements against real estate which has been the subject matter in a certiorari proceeding to review the assessment of such real estate for the purpose of taxation, where the petitioner was the attorney for the owners of the property. The claim by the attorney is made under sections 474 and 475 of the Judiciary Law.

Section 475 provides as follows: "From the commencement of an action or special proceeding, and of the service of an answer containing a counterclaim, the attorney who appears for a party has a lien upon his client's cause of action, claim or counterclaim, which attaches to a verdict, report, decision, judgment or final order in his client's favor, and the proceeds thereof in whosoever hands they may come."

I think the petitioner cannot maintain this proceeding, and that his remedy is by an action at law. It does not appear that there has been a "verdict, report, decision, judgment or final order in his client's favor," or that his clients have the "proceeds" of any "cause of action, claim or counterclaim."

The certiorari proceeding appears to have been settled before reaching a final order or judgment, and it does not appear that the owners reaped any direct benefit from that proceeding. For a subsequent year, it is alleged in the petition the assessment upon the property upon the client's real estate was materially reduced, and the petitioner claims that he accomplished that reduction. This is denied, however, by the respondents. Conceding that the petitioner's claim in this respect is true, I cannot see how a lien can be asserted against the real estate for the attorney's services before the town assessors in securing a reduction of the assessment. The provisions of section 475 of the Judiciary Law were not, in my opinion, intended to cover such a proceeding, nor do I think an attorney's lien can be enforced against real estate which is the subject of a certiorari proceeding, upon the theory that such real estate is the "proceeds thereof," within the meaning of section 475.

Motion denied.


Summaries of

MATTER OF ELY

Supreme Court, Westchester Special Term
Jan 1, 1913
79 Misc. 118 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1913)
Case details for

MATTER OF ELY

Case Details

Full title:Matter of the Application of WILLIAM A.H. ELY, an Attorney, to Determine…

Court:Supreme Court, Westchester Special Term

Date published: Jan 1, 1913

Citations

79 Misc. 118 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1913)
139 N.Y.S. 729

Citing Cases

Matter of Albrecht

No lien can arise where there is no fund to which it can attach. (6 C.J. 780, § 390; Matter of Hasbrouck, 153…

Goldstein v. E. Riv. Assoc

An attorney's charging lien may attach to such an uncertain and speculative interest as his client's…