From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Elliott v. City of Binghamton

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 1984
61 N.Y.2d 920 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Argued February 14, 1984

Decided March 20, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Robert E. Fischer, J.

Thomas M. Christina for appellant.

Kenneth Auerbach, Corporation Counsel ( David M. Dutko and Lawrence Praga of counsel), for respondents.



Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 94 A.D.2d 887).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.


Summaries of

Matter of Elliott v. City of Binghamton

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 1984
61 N.Y.2d 920 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Elliott v. City of Binghamton

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DONALD H. ELLIOTT, Appellant, v. CITY OF BINGHAMTON et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 20, 1984

Citations

61 N.Y.2d 920 (N.Y. 1984)
474 N.Y.S.2d 722
463 N.E.2d 38

Citing Cases

In Matter of Sturgess v. Village of Sleepy Hollow

As noted by the New York Court of Appeals, "[p]etitioner, having designated the union as his collective…

State v. Town of Wallkill

"[T]he line between mandatory and directory statutes cannot be drawn with precision" (People v Karr, 240 N.Y.…