From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Eggleston v. Shinola Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 19, 1920
129 N.E. 933 (N.Y. 1920)

Summary

In Eggleston v. Shinola Co. (229 N.Y. 622) no opinion was written, but the court states this: "The only question on appeal was as to whether the State Industrial Commission, after making a lump sum award as compensation for an injury, could reopen the case and make a further award where the claimant's disability had persisted."

Summary of this case from Metcalf v. Firth Carpet Co.

Opinion

Argued October 1, 1920

Decided October 19, 1920

John J. Reilly for appellants.

Charles D. Newton, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, CRANE and ELKUS, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Eggleston v. Shinola Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 19, 1920
129 N.E. 933 (N.Y. 1920)

In Eggleston v. Shinola Co. (229 N.Y. 622) no opinion was written, but the court states this: "The only question on appeal was as to whether the State Industrial Commission, after making a lump sum award as compensation for an injury, could reopen the case and make a further award where the claimant's disability had persisted."

Summary of this case from Metcalf v. Firth Carpet Co.
Case details for

Matter of Eggleston v. Shinola Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of HARRY EGGLESTON, Respondent, against SHINOLA…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 19, 1920

Citations

129 N.E. 933 (N.Y. 1920)
129 N.E. 933

Citing Cases

O'Malley v. International Motor Truck Corp.

Sections 35 and 36, Workmen's Compensation Act, Laws 1927, pp. 510-511. Due filing of a notice and report of…

Metcalf v. Firth Carpet Co.

(Code Civ. Proc. §§ 1002, 1282; Seaman v. Clarke, 75 App. Div. 345. ) In Eggleston v. Shinola Co. ( 229 N.Y.…