Opinion
Argued June 2, 1922
Decided July 12, 1922
Henry Adsit Bull for appellants.
Frank M. Spitzmiller for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Matter of Dybalski
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 12, 1922
138 N.E. 426 (N.Y. 1922)
Summaries of
Matter of Dybalski
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 12, 1922
138 N.E. 426 (N.Y. 1922)
Case details for
Matter of Dybalski
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of Proving the Will of MICHALINA DYBALSKI, Deceased…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jul 12, 1922
Citations
138 N.E. 426 (N.Y. 1922)
138 N.E. 426
Citing Cases
Matter of Pascal
In Matter of Dybalski ( 199 App. Div. 677, affd. 234 N.Y. 510) the courts considered facts comparable to…
In re the Estate of HockAs is pointed out in Matter of Ewen ( 206 A.D. 198, 201): "No Procrustean standard has been erected into…