From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Drug Res. v. Jstcs. of Court of Sessions

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 10, 1963
13 N.Y.2d 800 (N.Y. 1963)

Opinion

Argued June 4, 1963

Decided July 10, 1963

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, OWEN McGIVERN, J.

Philip A. Friedman for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Irving Galt, Irving L. Rollins and Philip Weinberg of counsel), for respondents.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( H. Richard Uviller and Michael R. Juviler of counsel), for District Attorney of New York County, amicus curiae.


Appeal dismissed, without costs, in the following memorandum: This appeal was taken as of right on the alleged ground that a constitutional question is directly involved (Civ. Prac. Act, § 588, subd. 1, par. [a]). A reading of the opinion at Special Term clearly demonstrates that that court did not pass upon constitutional issues but denied prohibition in the exercise of its discretion. Consequently, no constitutional question is presented and, for that reason, the appeal is dismissed.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI.


Summaries of

Matter of Drug Res. v. Jstcs. of Court of Sessions

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 10, 1963
13 N.Y.2d 800 (N.Y. 1963)
Case details for

Matter of Drug Res. v. Jstcs. of Court of Sessions

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DRUG RESEARCH CORPORATION et al., Appellants, v. JUSTICES…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 10, 1963

Citations

13 N.Y.2d 800 (N.Y. 1963)
242 N.Y.S.2d 225
192 N.E.2d 179

Citing Cases

Matter of Ricapito v. People

A denial of such a motion would be a proper subject of review on appeal should there be a judgment of…

Matter of Powell v. Crim. Ct., N.Y.C

( Matter of Kenler v. Murtagh, 12 A.D.2d 662, 663; see, also, Reed v. Littleton, 275 N.Y. 150.) Writs of…