From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Donald C. v. Michelle T

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 15, 1998
254 A.D.2d 124 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 15, 1998

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Leah Marks, J.).


The presumption that visitation would be in the child's best interest was rebutted by evidence that petitioner has not seen the child since she was a few months old, has spoken with her on the telephone only half a dozen times, has threatened her mother, and that the child would have to travel five hours by bus with a stranger to visit petitioner in prison.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Donald C. v. Michelle T

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 15, 1998
254 A.D.2d 124 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Donald C. v. Michelle T

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DONALD C., Appellant, v. MICHELLE T., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 15, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 124 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 290

Citing Cases

In the Matter of A Proceeding for Visitation Under Article 6 of Family Court Act, D.C. v. T.C., 2009 NY Slip Op 52003(U) (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 7/27/2009)

In evaluating best interests, the court must review the totality of the circumstances (Eschbach v Eschbach,…

In Matter of D.C. v. T.C.

In evaluating best interests, the court must review the totality of the circumstances ( Eschbach v Eschbach,…