From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Dodge v. Wm. J. Keller, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 20, 1952
279 App. Div. 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Summary

In Matter of Dodge v. Wm. J. Keller, Inc. (279 App. Div. 959) and Matter of Sorino v. Remington Rand (1 A.D.2d 720) not only was the evidence of employer participation in the social or athletic event greater than that shown here, but the factual issues were resolved by the board favorably to claimant.

Summary of this case from Matter of Legault v. Kraft Foods Company

Opinion

March 20, 1952.

Present — Foster, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.


Appeal by employer and its insurance carrier from an award of compensation in favor of claimant for facial disfigurement. The only issue raised on appeal is whether claimant's accidental injuries arose out of and in the course of his employment. He was injured while returning from a picnic which was sponsored and paid for by the employer. The board found that the picnic was an annual affair sponsored by the employer to promote better employer-employee relationship. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Dodge v. Wm. J. Keller, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 20, 1952
279 App. Div. 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

In Matter of Dodge v. Wm. J. Keller, Inc. (279 App. Div. 959) and Matter of Sorino v. Remington Rand (1 A.D.2d 720) not only was the evidence of employer participation in the social or athletic event greater than that shown here, but the factual issues were resolved by the board favorably to claimant.

Summary of this case from Matter of Legault v. Kraft Foods Company
Case details for

Matter of Dodge v. Wm. J. Keller, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of WAYNE A. DODGE, Respondent, against WM. J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 20, 1952

Citations

279 App. Div. 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

Dorman v. Gear Div. Chrysler Corp.

This determination is factual and thus, if supported by substantial evidence, must be upheld. We find ample…

Claim of Sargent v. Tilo Roofing Co.

There was substantial evidence supportive of the board's finding that the off-premises recreational activity…