From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Diaz v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 29, 1988
145 A.D.2d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

December 29, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Clinton County.


Following a Tier III Superintendent's hearing, petitioner was found guilty of stabbing another inmate. The determination was affirmed by respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services. Petitioner commenced this proceeding which was transferred to this court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g). Petitioner seeks to annul the administrative determination on the ground that his misconduct was not established by legally sufficient evidence in that the stabbing victim repudiated a statement made by him in an inculpatory letter. Petitioner also presented two alibi witnesses placing him elsewhere at the time of the attack. The Hearing Officer found the victim's repudiation incredible and chose not to credit it, nor the testimony of petitioner's alibi witnesses. A penalty of 18 months' keeplock and loss of privileges, along with one year loss of good time, was imposed.

The determination is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222). The Hearing Officer was in the best position to evaluate the credibility of witnesses and his decision in that regard should not be disturbed.

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Kane, J.P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Diaz v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 29, 1988
145 A.D.2d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Diaz v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RAMON DIAZ, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, III, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1988

Citations

145 A.D.2d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Matter of Inman v. Coughlin

The record reveals that both petitioner and his wife were given notice of this latter disposition and an…