From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Devany v. Rice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 19, 1981
84 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

October 19, 1981


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the Executive Director of the Nassau County Commission on Human Rights, dated May 13, 1980, which, after a hearing, terminated petitioner's employment with the Nassau County Commission on Human Rights. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Nassau County Commission on Human Rights for a de novo determination by a deputy director or any other duly qualified individual who may be designated (see County Law, § 401). The determination shall be based upon the original hearing record and shall include written findings of fact showing the grounds for the decision (see Matter of Klein v. Department of Mental Hygiene of State of N Y, 15 A.D.2d 562). Because of his personal involvement in the events underlying a number of the specifications of misconduct, executive director Rice should have disqualified himself from acting with respect to any of the charges (see, e.g., Sinicropi v. Milone, 80 A.D.2d 609; Matter of O'Reilly v. Pisani, 79 A.D.2d 973; Matter of Aiello v. Tempera, 65 A.D.2d 791). Rice not only instituted the charges, but he made the final determination thereon. Titone, J.P., Mangano, Gibbons and Thompson, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Devany v. Rice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 19, 1981
84 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Matter of Devany v. Rice

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EUGENE DEVANY, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. RICE, as Executive…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 19, 1981

Citations

84 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Prioleau v. Nicoletti

termination is annulled, with costs, and the matter is remitted to Joseph Nicoletti, Jr., the Commissioner of…

Matter of Reed v. Town of Huntington

A penalty is excessive only if it is so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circumstances,…