From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of DeSalvo v. Murray

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 11, 1933
188 N.E. 70 (N.Y. 1933)

Opinion

Argued June 1, 1933

Decided July 11, 1933

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Frank H. Hiscock and Harry J. Laragh for appellants.

Leonard G. McAneny, Corporation Counsel ( J. Raymond Hannon of counsel), for respondent.


Order in each proceeding affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and CROUCH, JJ. CRANE, J., dissents on the ground that there should have been an alternative order of mandamus granted. Not sitting: HUBBS, J.


Summaries of

Matter of DeSalvo v. Murray

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 11, 1933
188 N.E. 70 (N.Y. 1933)
Case details for

Matter of DeSalvo v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PETER DeSALVO, Appellant, against EDWARD J. MURRAY, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 11, 1933

Citations

188 N.E. 70 (N.Y. 1933)
188 N.E. 70

Citing Cases

Matter of Welling v. Fullen

( People ex rel. Chamberlain v. Knox, 45 A.D. 518.) The same rule was applied to a laborer who had actually…

Matter of Walsh v. Patterson

In People ex rel. Huber v. Adam ( 116 A.D. 613) the doctrine was established that a writ of mandamus can be…