From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Denora v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 17, 2000
274 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted May 3, 2000.

July 17, 2000.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Police Commissioner of the City of New York, dated March 31, 1998, which denied the petitioner's application for a pistol license, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.), dated July 27, 1999, which annulled the determination, granted the petition, and directed the Police Commissioner to issue a "Carry Business" handgun license to the petitioner.

Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Kristin M. Helmers and Janet L. Zaleon of counsel), for appellants.

John Z. Marangos, Staten Island, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

The appellants have broad discretion in ruling on permit applications, which they may deny for any good cause (see, Penal Law § 400.00; Matter of Westfall v. Lange, 175 A.D.2d 290). In this case, the appellants' determination was not arbitrary and capricious and should not be disturbed (see, CPLR 7803; Matter of Capuano v. Mahoney, 232 A.D.2d 482; Matter of Westfall v. Lange, supra).


Summaries of

Matter of Denora v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 17, 2000
274 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Denora v. Safir

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOHN DENORA, RESPONDENT, v. HOWARD SAFIR, ETC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 17, 2000

Citations

274 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
711 N.Y.S.2d 900

Citing Cases

Distefano v. Kelly

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The appellants have broad…