Summary
refusing to sustain service under Section 308 in absence of appointment pursuant to Rule 318
Summary of this case from Medal Knitwear v. JungOpinion
February 26, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.).
Ordered that on the Court's own motion the appellant's notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see, CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petitioner's motion is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.
The petitioner purportedly commenced this proceeding against James F. Kralik, the Sheriff of Rockland County, a natural person, by merely serving the notice of petition and petition upon a deputy sheriff. No subsequent mailing of the papers took place. Since James F. Kralik never designated the deputy sheriff as an agent to accept service in accordance with CPLR 318, service was ineffective pursuant to CPLR 308 (3) (see, Matter of Shea v. Kralik, 220 A.D.2d 750; Matter of Gottesman, 127 A.D.2d 563; Espy v. Giorlando, 85 A.D.2d 652). We discern no other valid method of service (cf., CPLR 308; 311). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.