Summary
In Matter of Davis (262 App. Div. 1064, appeal dismissed 287 N.Y. 767) it was held that personal service of the notice was not necessary where actual notice by mail had been received by the executor, — the Appellate Division pointing out that the manner of such service had been approved by the Surrogate "who has the power to prescribe a method, other than personally, of service on the executor".
Summary of this case from Matter of BornsteinOpinion
October 1, 1941.
Present — Crosby, P.J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party.
The order should be affirmed on the ground that there has been a substantial compliance with the statute in reference to the manner of service of the notice of election. The manner of such service herein has been approved by the surrogate who has the power to prescribe a method, other than personally, of service on the executor; except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting the motion, on the ground that the executor, under the facts, was without power to waive personal service of the notice of election to the detriment of the legatees named in the will. (The order denies a motion by the executor to dismiss a petition to determine the validity of a notice of election.)