From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Cruz v. First Cardinal Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 2000
273 A.D.2d 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued May 1, 2000.

June 5, 2000.

In a proceeding pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 29(5) to approve the settlement of a third-party action nunc pro tunc, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), entered July 9, 1999, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Dell Little (Anita Nissan Yehuda, Roslyn Heights, N.Y., of counsel), for appellant.

Cherry, Edson Kelly, Hempstead, N.Y. (Henriette Frieder and Richard G. Guttentag of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that it was without authority to grant the petitioner's application pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 29(5) to approve a settlement nunc pro tunc, inasmuch as no third-party action had ever been commenced (see, Kosiorek v. University of Rochester, 152 A.D.2d 927).


Summaries of

Matter of Cruz v. First Cardinal Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 2000
273 A.D.2d 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Cruz v. First Cardinal Corporation

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JAIR A. CRUZ, APPELLANT, v. FIRST CARDINAL CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 5, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
709 N.Y.S.2d 447

Citing Cases

Russo v. New Hampshire Ins. Co.

Pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 29(5), "an employee may settle a lawsuit arising out of the same…

Gherghi v. Hereford Ins. Co.

In addition, petitioner has failed to present an affidavit of a physician ( see,Workers' Compensation Law §…