Opinion
September 27, 1972
Appeal from the Niagara Special Term.
Present — Goldman, P.J., Del Vecchio, Marsh, Moule and Cardamone, JJ.
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. (See Matter of Murray v. City of New York, 30 N.Y.2d 113.)
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Matter of Crugnale v. City of Niagara Falls
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 27, 1972
40 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Summaries of
Matter of Crugnale v. City of Niagara Falls
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 27, 1972
40 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for
Matter of Crugnale v. City of Niagara Falls
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of MARY CRUGNALE, an Infant, by PATSY CRUGNALE, Her Parent…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Sep 27, 1972
Citations
40 A.D.2d 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Citing Cases
Matter of Febles v. City of N.Y
890; Matter of Goglas v. New York City Housing Auth., 13 A.D.2d 939, affd. 11 N.Y.2d 680; Schnee v. City of…
Crume v. Clarence Central School District No. 1in behalf of the infant before the expiration of the time for filing notice of claim, the failure to file in…