From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Crowley v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1994
202 A.D.2d 328 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 24, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.).


A rational basis for finding that petitioner was not actually engaged in the performance of police duties at time of the accident (Administrative Code of City of N.Y. § 12-127) exists by reason of the fact that the accident occurred after petitioner had been dismissed from his tour of duty. Deference is due to respondent's reading of the statute as excluding "portal to portal" travel time.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Asch and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Crowley v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1994
202 A.D.2d 328 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Crowley v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT M. CROWLEY, Appellant, v. LEE P. BROWN, as Police…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 328 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
609 N.Y.S.2d 11

Citing Cases

Rivera v. Shea

Respondent, the Board of Trustees rejected petitioners application for ADR benefits, finding that…

Rivera v. Shea

As stated in Crowley v. Brown, deference must be given to the respondents in its interpretation that excludes…