From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Cortijo v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 13, 1990
158 A.D.2d 345 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

February 13, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Dontzin, J.).


"It is well settled that a probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing and without a statement of reasons" where the decision is made in good faith and not for a constitutionally impermissible purpose. (Matter of York v McGuire, 63 N.Y.2d 760, 761.)

Petitioner bears the burden of presenting evidence to show that the Commissioner acted in bad faith. (Haberman v Codd, 48 A.D.2d 505. ) Petitioner was not given any reason for her termination. She speculates that she was terminated either due to her performance on the shooting range or psychological reasons. Neither reason would support a finding of bad faith even where the agency is in receipt of conflicting opinions. (Matter of Talamo v Murphy, 38 N.Y.2d 637.) "A mere belief of bad faith does not satisfy the requirement, or warrant a hearing." (D'Aiuto v Department of Water Resources, 51 A.D.2d 700, 701.)

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Asch, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Cortijo v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 13, 1990
158 A.D.2d 345 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Cortijo v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CAROLYN CORTIJO, Appellant, v. BENJAMIN WARD, as Police…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 13, 1990

Citations

158 A.D.2d 345 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
551 N.Y.S.2d 36

Citing Cases

Matter of Medina v. Sielaff

The standard for reviewing the termination of a probationary employee was recently noted by this court in…

In Matter of Duncan v. Kelly

The purpose of the probationary period is to provide a trial period to ascertain an individual's merit and…