From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Connell v. State Tax Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 8, 1944
267 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Opinion

March 8, 1944.


Relator, a general agent, for the city of New York, Long Island and Westchester County, of the Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company of Philadelphia, asserts that an unincorporated business tax (Tax Law, art. 16-A) should not be assessed against him. Substantially the same question was determined in People ex rel. Luther v. State Tax Commission ( 265 App. Div. 976, affd. 291 N.Y. 691) adversely to relator's contention. In the Luther case exemption was claimed upon the ground that the relators were fiduciaries. Here the defense is that Connell is an employee of the insurance company. Determination confirmed, without costs. Hill, P.J., Bliss, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1006.]


Summaries of

Matter of Connell v. State Tax Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 8, 1944
267 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)
Case details for

Matter of Connell v. State Tax Commission

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CLANCY D. CONNELL, Relator, against STATE TAX COMMISSION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 8, 1944

Citations

267 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Feinberg v. Chapman

Neither is it persuasive that they did not have any physical assets or transferable investment in the…