From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Collazo v. Wilmot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 3, 1980
75 A.D.2d 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

April 3, 1980


Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered April 23, 1979 in Chemung County, which dismissed the petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, seeking to annul a determination in a disciplinary proceeding. The petitioner was charged with being involved in misconduct in the nature of joining in a melee and assaulting a corrections officer on July 9, 1978. As a result of such charges, disciplinary proceedings were held, and upon a finding of guilt, punishment was imposed. This proceeding, pursuant to CPLR article 78, was brought to review the determination and seeks to have the findings of guilt and the punishment imposed annulled and expunged from petitioner's record. The respondent submitted documentary evidence upon the return and such evidence refutes the allegation of the petitioner as to an unconstitutional denial of due process in the conduct of the instant proceeding. (See Matter of Amato v. Ward, 41 N.Y.2d 469, 472-473; Matter of Hicks v. Le Fevre, 59 A.D.2d 423.) As to the allegation that the procedure did not comply with a requirement of the regulations ( 7 NYCRR 253.3) allowing a choice of representatives at the hearing, it is sufficient to note that no objection was made by petitioner at the hearing (Matter of Hicks v. Le Fevre, supra). Judgment affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J.P., Sweeney, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Collazo v. Wilmot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 3, 1980
75 A.D.2d 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Matter of Collazo v. Wilmot

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOE L. COLLAZO, Appellant, v. JOHN WILMOT, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1980

Citations

75 A.D.2d 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

People ex rel Thompson v. Wilmot

It thus constitutes a rule or regulation which the Division must comply with ( Matter of Johnson v Smith, 83…

Sapp v. LeFevre

Initially, it is claimed that the Superintendent's proceeding was untimely as it was not commenced within…