From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Cole v. Bd. of Education of Syosset

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1990
167 A.D.2d 538 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 26, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Collins, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the proceeding is dismissed.

At the end of the 1987-1988 school year, the respondent Board of Education of Syosset Central School District (hereinafter the Board) abolished one school nurse-teacher position. Pursuant to Education Law § 2510 (2), the Board determined that the petitioner was the least senior teacher in that tenure area and thus removed her from her full-time position. In calculating the petitioner's seniority, the Board did not credit any of the petitioner's service while she was assigned to a parochial school on the ground that it was a part-time position for which she did not earn seniority credit.

The parochial school day was six hours, while the school day at the school district's public schools was seven hours. Thus, while assigned to the parochial school, the petitioner had been paid only six sevenths of a full-time salary. In this proceeding, the Supreme Court agreed with the petitioner's contention that she nevertheless worked a full day at the parochial school and therefore her position at the parochial school should be deemed a de facto full-time position. We disagree.

It is well settled that in the absence of a collective bargaining provision to the contrary, part-time service need not be credited in computing seniority credit (see, Matter of Ceparano v. Ambach, 53 N.Y.2d 873; Matter of Schlosser v. Board of Educ., 47 N.Y.2d 811; Matter of Schoenfeld v. Board of Coop. Educ. Servs., 98 A.D.2d 723). The petitioner does not dispute that she was notified in writing that her position at the parochial school was considered part time. While the petitioner further contends that she taught the same number of hours as the other teachers in the parochial school, the appropriate comparison is to the time worked by full-time teachers in the school district. The petitioner concedes that she worked only six sevenths of the time worked by the other school-nurse teachers in the school district.

The reliance by the petitioner and the Supreme Court on Matter of Ablondi v. Commissioner of Educ. ( 87 Misc.2d 516, affd. 54 A.D.2d 507) is misplaced. In that case, the courts merely held that there was a rational basis for the Commissioner of Education's determination that a teacher assigned just to one kindergarten class, which by its nature was a half-day session, was entitled to seniority credit. However, we find no reason to compel the Board to adopt a similar ruling in this case with regard to the petitioner's part-time service in the parochial school.

Accordingly, we find that the Board's actions had a rational basis and were not arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, or contrary to law. Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Lawrence and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Cole v. Bd. of Education of Syosset

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1990
167 A.D.2d 538 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Cole v. Bd. of Education of Syosset

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANDREA COLE, Respondent, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SYOSSET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 538 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 209

Citing Cases

Glantz v. Bd. of Educ.

The petitioners do not dispute the Board's contention that Education Law § 3013(2) applies only to full-time…