Opinion
May 28, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County [Harold Tompkins, J.].
Petitioner was afforded a fair hearing and substantial evidence supports the determination ( see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Division of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176). The Hearing Officers credibility determinations will not be disturbed by this Court ( see, Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 443-444), and petitioners claim of bias is unsubstantiated. An administrative proceeding is not subject to the same rules of evidence as a trial ( People ex rel. Vega v. Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130, 139), and, in any event, there is no indication that the Hearing Officer took into account uncharged conduct and hearsay in making his report and recommendation.
Concur — Lerner, P. J., Ellerin, Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.