From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Claremont v. De Coss

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 1917
116 N.E. 1044 (N.Y. 1917)

Opinion

Argued March 1, 1917

Decided March 20, 1917

Andrew J. Nellis for appellants.

Egburt E. Woodbury, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CHASE, CUDDEBACK, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ. Dissenting: HISCOCK, Ch. J., and HOGAN, J.


Summaries of

Claim of Claremont v. De Coss

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 1917
116 N.E. 1044 (N.Y. 1917)
Case details for

Claim of Claremont v. De Coss

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MARY CLAREMONT, Respondent, against OVID DE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 20, 1917

Citations

116 N.E. 1044 (N.Y. 1917)
116 N.E. 1044