From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1908
85 N.E. 1117 (N.Y. 1908)

Opinion

Argued May 19, 1908

Decided June 2, 1908

Francis K. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel ( James D. Bell and Edward H. Wilson, of counsel) for appellant.

John Lyon, Francis G. Hooley, Albert E. Seibert, Harry G. Clock, James P. Niemann, Theodore N. Ripsom, Seth Sprague Terry and Walter Underhill for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1908
85 N.E. 1117 (N.Y. 1908)
Case details for

Matter of City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, to…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 2, 1908

Citations

85 N.E. 1117 (N.Y. 1908)
85 N.E. 1117

Citing Cases

White Plains Urban Renewal Agency v. Tencer

taxable disbursement (see, e.g., Hempstead Bank v Ryan, 42 A.D.2d 779; Cooper v Dubow, 41 A.D.2d 843). This…

Van Schaick v. Marinelli

The word "relate" is synonymous with "pertain," and presupposes another subject-matter. ( Matter of City of…