From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ciaffone v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 1958
5 A.D.2d 884 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

March 24, 1958

Present — Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Hallinan, JJ.


Appeal from so much of an order as granted leave, pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law, to serve a notice of claim in behalf of an injured infant. Order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The infant was seven years of age. The school authorities were promptly notified of the accident, and her teacher, an appellant herein, took her to the school office. The infant was then taken to the school doctor and to a hospital. Therefore, there was no prejudice from the failure to file a timely notice of claim. The insurance carrier for the school district communicated with the infant's father. Forty-five days after the accident, the infant's parents retained attorneys who corresponded with the insurance carrier. A seven-year-old child does not have the mental capacity to protect her rights. In substantial degree the delay in filing was attributable to the fact of infancy, and there was a definite relationship between that fact and the failure to file within the 90-day statutory period. The Special Term properly exercised its discretion ( Natoli v. Board of Educ. of City of Norwich, 277 App. Div. 915, affd. 303 N.Y. 646; Matter of Hogan v. City of Cohoes, 279 App. Div. 282; Biancoviso v. City of New York, 285 App. Div. 320).


Summaries of

Matter of Ciaffone v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 1958
5 A.D.2d 884 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Matter of Ciaffone v. Board of Education

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MARY CIAFFONE, an Infant, Respondent, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1958

Citations

5 A.D.2d 884 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

Matter of Smolenski v. Motor Vehicle Accident

There was a definite relationship between the fact of infancy and the failure to file in time. The Special…

Matter of Goglas v. New York City Hous. Auth

And, particularly, such an infant, presumably lacking the capacity to think and proceed for himself, should…