From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Central Hanover Bank Trust Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 3, 1949
85 N.E.2d 54 (N.Y. 1949)

Opinion

Argued January 4, 1949

Decided March 3, 1949

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, COLLINS, S.

Kenneth J. Mullane, as special guardian for infants and others having interest in income of trust fund, appellant.

James N. Vaughan, as special guardian for infants and others having interest in principal of trust fund, respondent.

Albert B. Maginnes, J. Quincy Hunsicker, 3d, and William D. Seidler for Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, respondent.

Peter Keber and C. Alexander Capron for New York State Bankers Association, amicus curiae, in support of respondents' position.


Appeals dismissed, with costs to the respondent trustee payable out of the fund, upon the following grounds:

As to the appeal taken directly to this court from so much of the final decree of voluntary accounting (entered in Surrogate's Court, August 12, 1948) as overrules objections interposed by the appellant, such decree may not be the subject of direct appeal to this court because the determination thereby made was not one which the Surrogate "must grant" upon a motion for judgment or order (Civ. Prac. Act, § 590, cl. [b]).

As to the appeal from the order of the Appellate Division (entered June 21, 1948) affirming an intermediate decree of Surrogate's Court (entered November 26, 1947) in a voluntary accounting proceeding, such order — being a ruling upon objections in the nature of pleadings (Surrogate's Ct. Act, § 49) — is intermediate in character and does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

As to the appeal taken directly to this court from an order of Surrogate's Court (entered August 12, 1948) upon the remittitur of the Appellate Division — such order is intermediate in character and does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution and may not be the subject of direct appeal to this court under clause (b) of section 590 of the Civil Practice Act. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE and FULD, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Central Hanover Bank Trust Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 3, 1949
85 N.E.2d 54 (N.Y. 1949)
Case details for

Matter of Central Hanover Bank Trust Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Accounting of CENTRAL HANOVER BANK AND TRUST COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 3, 1949

Citations

85 N.E.2d 54 (N.Y. 1949)
85 N.E.2d 54

Citing Cases

Matter of O'Brien v. Commissioner of Educ

Such rules must be reasonable and adapted to the matter at hand, as well as in accord with statute and…

Guaranty Trust Co. v. State of New York

Nonetheless for that, however, the final judgment for the claimant was occasioned by the parties themselves…