From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Centineo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 10, 1976
53 A.D.2d 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

June 10, 1976


Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 2, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective May 14, 1975 on the ground of misconduct. Claimant, an automobile salesman, was directed by his employer to proceed to another automobile agency and pick up a car which he had sold. When claimant refused to do so, he was discharged. The board held that claimant's conduct constituted misconduct since it was necessary to bring the automobile in question to the employer's premises in order to complete the sale. The board found that the employer's request was reasonable. A refusal to complete work assigned in the regular course of the employer's business constitutes misconduct so as to disqualify a person from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P.J., Greenblott, Kane, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Centineo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 10, 1976
53 A.D.2d 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of Centineo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ANTHONY CENTINEO, Appellant. LOUIS L…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 10, 1976

Citations

53 A.D.2d 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Matter of Speciner

Under the circumstances of this case, claimant's refusal to prepare an income tax return for a valued client,…

Matter of Severino

The evidence established that claimant refused to cooperate with a reasonable request by his supervisor to…