From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CBS, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 20, 1981
429 N.E.2d 813 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Argued September 16, 1981

Decided October 20, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department.

Lawrence M. Monat for appellant.

Jerry Slater and Ronald E. Guttman for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

On the record the no probable cause decision of the Division of Human Rights was not arbitrary or capricious. Furthermore, it cannot be said that the procedure followed at the division's investigation conferences, involving written and oral presentations, constituted either a violation of the statutory scheme (Executive Law, § 297, subd 2; § 297-a, subd 7) or the deprivation of a constitutional right. Due process does not require all the accoutrements of an adversarial trial at every stage of an administrative proceeding (see Friendly, Some Kind of Hearing, 123 U of Pa L Rev 1267).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

CBS, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 20, 1981
429 N.E.2d 813 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

CBS, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CBS, INC., Respondent, v. STATE HUMAN RIGHTS APPEAL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 20, 1981

Citations

429 N.E.2d 813 (N.Y. 1981)
429 N.E.2d 813
445 N.Y.S.2d 135

Citing Cases

State Division of Human Rights v. Stanmor Liquor Co.

We disagree. A confrontation conference is neither statutorily nor constitutionally required ( Matter of CBS,…

Pan Amer v. Human Rights Bd.

tter of Rankin v Lavine, 41 N.Y.2d 911, 912; Matter of Reyes v Dumpson, 40 N.Y.2d 725, 729). As this court…