From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Carroll v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 29, 1941
262 App. Div. 481 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

October 29, 1941.

Appeal from Supreme Court of New York County, MILLER, J.

Daniel J. Downing, for the appellant.

John T. Dooling, for the respondent.

Russell Lord Tarbox, for the Board of Elections of the City of New York.


The petitions herein were sufficient. They contained a statement that the signers were duly qualified voters who had registered to vote in the borough of Manhattan, city of New York, within eighteen months previous to the filing of the petition. In this respect the petitions differed from those considered in Matter of Goldberg v. Cohen ( 257 App. Div. 675; affd., 281 N.Y. 776). As we indicated in the case cited, there is no express requirement in the statute that the address of registration be given.

The order appealed from should be reversed and the motion denied.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied.


Summaries of

Matter of Carroll v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 29, 1941
262 App. Div. 481 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Matter of Carroll v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of WILLIAM A. CARROLL, Petitioner…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 29, 1941

Citations

262 App. Div. 481 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
30 N.Y.S.2d 555

Citing Cases

Matter of Pavis v. Heffernan

However, the sufficiency of a petition was upheld where, in addition to the information required by section…