From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Carlo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 9, 1992
179 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

January 9, 1992

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant left her employment as a secretary for Brooklyn Law School and moved to New Jersey. She claims that living in New York City caused her extreme mental distress as she was in constant fear for her personal safety. Although claimant had been in therapy prior to her employment with the law school, she was not under any medical care when she resigned nor was there any evidence in the record that she was advised to quit her job due to these fears (see, Matter of Grant [Levine], 50 A.D.2d 1006; Matter of Chawkin [Catherwood], 18 A.D.2d 750). In addition, any incidents about which claimant testified that may have caused her fear were unrelated to her employment. Consequently, the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that personal and noncompelling reasons caused claimant to voluntarily leave her employment while work was still available and when she had no definite employment to go to is supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld (see, Matter of Baker [Hartnett], 147 A.D.2d 790, 791, appeal dismissed 74 N.Y.2d 714; Matter of Behnke [White Carriage Corp. — Roberts], 97 A.D.2d 679, 680; Matter of Sillan [French Tel. Cable Co. — Levine], 53 A.D.2d 719).

Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., Levine, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Carlo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 9, 1992
179 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Carlo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JACQUELINE DE CARLO, Appellant. THOMAS F…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 9, 1992

Citations

179 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
577 N.Y.S.2d 974

Citing Cases

Matter of the Claim of Walls

l brandishing a gun as he fled from a robbery. Fear for one's safety may be found to constitute reasonable…

Matter of Kaufman

In fact, claimant never even knew the exact location of the new office. Accordingly, under the circumstances…