From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Carlan v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 16, 1987
128 A.D.2d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

March 16, 1987

Appeal from the Board of Education of the Lawrence Union Free School District.


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner, Andrew E. Carlan, was dismissed from his position following a hearing under Education Law § 3020-a, upon the hearing panel's findings that he was guilty of some 53 charges and specifications concerning, inter alia, repeated and continuous neglect of duty, insubordination, failure to prepare and grade certain final examinations, and manipulation of students' test scores.

Although the petitioner contends that the respondent's determination is arbitrary and capricious in that it failed to give sufficient weight to mitigating circumstances surrounding the numerous acts of misconduct, our review of the record indicates that there is substantial evidence to support the findings of guilt as to the charges lodged against him. Accordingly, we must confirm that determination as we can neither weigh the evidence in the record nor substitute our judgment for that of the agency designated by the Legislature as the most appropriate forum for resolving these disputes (see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222; Matter of Koch v. Webster Cent. School Dist., 89 A.D.2d 778, affd 57 N.Y.2d 1028).

We also find that the penalty of dismissal, while obviously severe, is not so excessive as to shock the conscience. The circumstances disclosed on the record support the panel's finding that there is no indication that the petitioner would not repeat the same or similar conduct if he were permitted to return to work (see, Matter of Short v. Nassau County Civ. Serv. Commn., 45 N.Y.2d 721; Kaczala v. Board of Educ., 123 A.D.2d 668).

We have considered all of the petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Rubin, J.P., Kunzeman, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Carlan v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 16, 1987
128 A.D.2d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Matter of Carlan v. Board of Education

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANDREW E. CARLAN, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 16, 1987

Citations

128 A.D.2d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Molinari v. City of New York

The court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the body, board or officers empowered by law to make…

Matter of Scheiber v. N.Y. City Bd. of Educ

The various charges were based on the petitioner's actions while employed at three high schools, including a…