Opinion
July 9, 1998
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits inmates from engaging in sexual acts. Received into evidence at petitioner's disciplinary hearing was the detailed misbehavior report authored by the facility librarian who observed petitioner masturbating at the end of a set of library shelves. This report, coupled with the librarian's corroborating testimony in which she explicitly described the incident, was sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt ( see, Matter of Osborne v. McGinnis, 243 A.D.2d 882). Petitioner's explanation for his conduct merely created a credibility issue which the Hearing Officer was free to resolve against him ( see, Matter of Jiminez v. Berry, 203 A.D.2d 815, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 808). Finally, petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer considered his prior conduct in assessing his credibility and as evidence of guilt finds no support in the record. While the record does show that the Hearing Officer did consider petitioner's history of similar behavior in determining the appropriate penalty, such consideration was proper ( see, Matter of Edmonson v. Coombe, 247 A.D.2d 693; Matter of Hart v. Coombe, 229 A.D.2d 754, 755, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 802).
White, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Peters, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.