From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Brooklyn Bar Association

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 1940
260 App. Div. 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Opinion

December 2, 1940.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ.


Through a corporation controlled by them, respondents engaged in financial transaction in violation of sections 340 Banking and 357 Banking of the Banking Law. Although the business was voluntarily discontinued, respondents proceeded to sue on claims growing out of the business until they were advised by the Attorney-General to refrain. Each of the respondents will be suspended from the practice of the law for a period of one year. The court directs that respondent Martin H. Weisman, admitted as an attorney under the name of Morris Weisman, and respondent M. Michael Glassman, admitted as an attorney under the name of Max Glassman, be suspended from the practice of the law for a period of one year.


Summaries of

Matter of Brooklyn Bar Association

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 1940
260 App. Div. 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)
Case details for

Matter of Brooklyn Bar Association

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of BROOKLYN BAR ASSOCIATION in Respect of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1940

Citations

260 App. Div. 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)