From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Brockman v. Dordelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 1975
48 A.D.2d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

May 12, 1975


In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel appellants to remit back pay, etc., to petitioner for the period of his suspension, which, pending the hearing of formal charges against him, exceeded the statutory period of 30 days (see Civil Service Law, § 75, subd 3), the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered August 28, 1974, which granted the application. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding dismissed on the merits. Since the delay in holding the hearing which eventually resulted in petitioner's discharge was due exclusively to his conduct in procuring repeated stays in his attempt to permanently enjoin the hearing, he is in no position to invoke the statutory limit (Matter of Bentley v Henninger, 10 A.D.2d 900; cf. Matter of Amkraut v Hults, 21 A.D.2d 260). Latham, Acting P.J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Brockman v. Dordelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 1975
48 A.D.2d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Matter of Brockman v. Dordelman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM T. BROCKMAN, Respondent, v. CARL J. DORDELMAN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 12, 1975

Citations

48 A.D.2d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Matter of Yeampierre v. Gutman

This appeal is from the judgment which computed that award following the hearing at Special Term. The…

Matter of Yeampierre v. Gutman

Accordingly, it is clear that even if found guilty and ultimately dismissed, an employee is entitled to…