From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Brazill v. N.Y. State Bd. of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1980
76 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

June 9, 1980


In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel respondent to release petitioner from custody, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 27, 1980, which dismissed the proceeding. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and petition granted to the extent that the matter is remitted to the Board of Parole for rehearing in accordance herewith. At the most recent parole hearing accorded to petitioner, in March, 1979, the Board of Parole properly considered its own guidelines which had not been in effect at the time of the previous hearing on March 14, 1978. In so doing, however, the board inaccurately stated that the petitioner had been "convicted of Rape 1°" (rather than attempted rape). Because of the likelihood that such error may have affected the board's decision to deny parole, a new hearing is required. Cohalan, J.P., Margett, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Brazill v. N.Y. State Bd. of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1980
76 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Matter of Brazill v. N.Y. State Bd. of Parole

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROGER BRAZILL, on Behalf of JOHN DOE, Appellant, v. NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1980

Citations

76 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Torres v. Stanford

A review of the statement by the appeals unit inaccurately reported that petitioner murdered six, as opposed…

Smith v. N.Y. State Bd. of Parole

Moreover, a review of respondent's determination (supra) reveals that the Parole Board correctly understood…