From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Brannigan v. Town of Oyster Bay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 16, 1988
141 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

June 16, 1988

Appeal from the Workers' Compensation Board.


The employer contends that the Workers' Compensation Board erred in discharging the Special Disability Fund due to the employer's failure to file a claim for reimbursement of death benefits. It is the employer's argument that since all parties, including the Board and the Special Disability Fund, treated the disability claim and the death claim as a single case until after the expiration of the two-year period within which the employer was required to seek reimbursement on the death claim (see, Workers' Compensation Law § 15 [f]), the employer's failure to file a separate application for reimbursement on the death claim should not result in the discharge of the Special Disability Fund. The Board's decision must be affirmed since "claims for disability and death benefits are clearly separate and distinct assertions of rights and thus separate claims for reimbursement are required" (Matter of Molina v Wave Crest Motel, 46 A.D.2d 957, 958). We see nothing irrational in the Board's requirement of strict adherence to this mandate (see, Matter of Roland v Sunmark Indus., 127 A.D.2d 894). The employer was well aware of the death claim and had ample opportunity to seek reimbursement within the required two-year period.

Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Special Disability Fund. Mahoney, P.J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Brannigan v. Town of Oyster Bay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 16, 1988
141 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Brannigan v. Town of Oyster Bay

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of RICHARD BRANNIGAN, Respondent, v. TOWN OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1988

Citations

141 A.D.2d 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Seminerio v. Glen Partitions, Inc.

This appeal ensued. Under most circumstances, strict compliance with the filing provisions for separate…

Matter of Thousand v. Human Res. Admin

Under these circumstances, we see no basis for Zurich's assertion that it was unable to conduct an adequate…