From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Boyle

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, Queens County
Dec 23, 1947
191 Misc. 291 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1947)

Opinion

December 23, 1947.

Starke Cook for Katherine McDermott, petitioner.

Daniel G. Connolly for John F. Callahan and another, contestants.



The paper writing offered for probate does not in terms nominate an executor. One sentence, however, reads: "My sister Nora or her daughter Katherine or son Thomas are to take care of my funeral." As the duty to arrange and pay for the funeral is one of those devolving upon an executor, such direction is deemed sufficient to constitute a valid nomination according to the tenor of the will. (See, Matter of Hazen, 175 Misc. 851.) The proof satisfies the court that the propounded instrument was duly executed as a will at a time when decedent was competent and free from restraint. Nora and Thomas having renounced, letters testamentary will issue to petitioner, Katherine, upon her qualifying according to law. Submit decree accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of Boyle

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, Queens County
Dec 23, 1947
191 Misc. 291 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1947)
Case details for

Matter of Boyle

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of MARY A. BOYLE, Deceased

Court:Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, Queens County

Date published: Dec 23, 1947

Citations

191 Misc. 291 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1947)
80 N.Y.S.2d 24

Citing Cases

Matter of Tuthill

An executor was not expressly appointed, but it was held that there was a clear implication that the decedent…

Matter of McAllister

The propounded instrument may therefore be admitted to probate as decedent's holographic will under…