From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bouquet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 20, 1967
28 A.D.2d 11 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

June 20, 1967.

John G. Bonomi ( Michael Franck with him on the brief), for petitioner.

Raphael P. Koenig for respondent.


Respondent was admitted to practice in 1932, in the First Judicial Department. A Referee has found that one of three charges of professional misconduct lodged against respondent has been sustained. The evidence as to that charge demonstrates that respondent knowingly made a false statement in an affidavit submitted to the Surrogate's Court, Kings County, in support of an application for an order permitting him, as executor of an estate, to enter into the apartment of his decedent. His intentionally false statement cannot be excused on the ground that the application would have been granted even if the affidavit had not contained such statement. Accordingly, the report of the Referee is in all respects confirmed.

Respondent has been a member of the Bar, in good standing, for almost 35 years. While his false statement constitutes professional misconduct, respondent's previous good record and the circumstances surrounding the wrongful act, lead us to conclude that no more than three months' suspension is warranted.

Accordingly, respondent is suspended for three months. Petitioner's motion and respondent's cross motion are granted only to the extent herein indicated.

STEUER, J.P., CAPOZZOLI, TILZER, McNALLY and McGIVERN, JJ., concur.

Respondent suspended for a period of three months effective July 20, 1967.


Summaries of

Matter of Bouquet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 20, 1967
28 A.D.2d 11 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Matter of Bouquet

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WALTER V. BOUQUET, an Attorney, Respondent. ASSOCIATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 20, 1967

Citations

28 A.D.2d 11 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
280 N.Y.S.2d 941

Citing Cases

Matter of Miller

Respondent's actions herein constitute professional misconduct which cannot be condoned and discipline is…

Matter of Ferris

Upon interrogation by Special Term, respondent admitted that he had not made the trips, but explained that…