From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bonilla v. N.Y. City Civil Serv

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 22, 1992
186 A.D.2d 64 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

September 22, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin B. Stecher, J.).


In 1986, petitioner passed a civil service examination for the position of sanitation worker and was placed on the eligible list. Subsequently, in May, 1989, he was disqualified from the list due to a "psychiatric disorder." It is undisputed that petitioner had suffered a nervous breakdown and received outpatient treatment for several years. After petitioner exhausted his administrative remedies, but before he commenced the instant proceeding, the eligible list expired.

We find that the IAS Court properly relied on Matter of Deas v Levitt ( 73 N.Y.2d 525, cert denied 493 U.S. 933), and case law from this Court (see generally, Matter of Hasenstab v McGuire, 178 A.D.2d 217, affd 80 N.Y.2d 812; Matter of Carchietta v Department of Personnel, 172 A.D.2d 304; Matter of Rigia v Koehler, 165 A.D.2d 525; Boasi v New York City Civ. Serv. Commn., 158 A.D.2d 318) in determining that petitioner's failure to commence this proceeding prior to expiration of the eligible list required dismissal.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Milonas, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Bonilla v. N.Y. City Civil Serv

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 22, 1992
186 A.D.2d 64 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Bonilla v. N.Y. City Civil Serv

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SAMUEL BONILLA, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY CIVIL SERVICE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 22, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 64 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
588 N.Y.S.2d 271

Citing Cases

Matter of Bonilla v. New York City Civ. Serv. Commn

Decided January 19, 1993 Appeal from (1st Dept: 186 A.D.2d 64) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…

Corredine v. VW Credit, Inc.

Moreover, the evidence presented clearly establishes that Volkswagen is the titleholder of the subject…