From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bonar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 5, 2001
280 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

February 5, 2001.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1992 under the name Ursula C. Brumskine, was suspended by this Court's order dated June 7, 1999 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a ( 262 A.D.2d 702).

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Ursula Brumskine Bonar, Darnestown, Maryland, respondent in person.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ.


DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION


Respondent has now complied with the registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and has paid the fees as required by the statute and rules of the Chief Administrative Judge. Petitioner does not object to respondent's instant application for reinstatement.

Respondent's application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted, and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately


Summaries of

Matter of Bonar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 5, 2001
280 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Bonar

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 5, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
720 N.Y.S.2d 597