From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Block v. Franklin Square Union Free School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 29, 1979
72 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

October 29, 1979


In a proceeding to compel respondent to reinstate petitioner to his position in its employ, with back pay, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 1, 1979, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner urges that rule 19 of the Nassau County Civil Service Commission, which delegates to "appointing authorities," such as the respondent, the power to fix the probationary terms of newly appointed or promoted civil servants at not less than 8 weeks nor more than 26 weeks, is repugnant to subdivision 2 of section 63 Civ. Serv. of the Civil Service Law and hence is unlawful. We note first that although this argument has been raised for the first time on appeal, we may nevertheless consider it, as the question presented is one of law "which appeared upon the face of the record and which could not have been avoided by [respondent] if brought to [its] attention at the proper juncture [Such an] argument should not be lost because of the error of petitioner's counsel in not raising it earlier" (Matter of Knickerbocker Field Club v Site Selection Bd. of City of N.Y., 41 A.D.2d 539, 540; see Persky v Bank of Amer. Nat. Assn., 261 N.Y. 212). However, we find petitioner's argument to be meritless. Rule 19 was duly promulgated pursuant to section 20 Civ. Serv. of the Civil Service Law and thus has the "force and effect of law" (see Civil Service Law, § 20, subd 2). It is not repugnant to any other law, nor have we been cited to any authority which would indicate that the delegation of authority implicit therein is unlawful. People ex rel. Kastor v Kearny ( 164 N.Y. 64), relied on by petitioner, is inapposite. That case dealt solely with the requirement that a newly appointed or promoted civil servant be allowed a definite probationary period within which to demonstrate his fitness for the position. It did not make unlawful the delegation by a civil service commission to an appointing authority of the power to fix a specific probationary period before a civil servant may assume his duties on a permanent basis. Rabin, J.P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Gibbons, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Block v. Franklin Square Union Free School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 29, 1979
72 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Block v. Franklin Square Union Free School District

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HOWARD BLOCK, Appellant, v. FRANKLIN SQUARE UNION FREE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 29, 1979

Citations

72 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Weiner v. MKVII-Westchester, LLC

on, the first notice of pendency, and its cancellation appear on the record of this appeal, the defendants…

Ruggiero v. Fahey

However, the strong presumption of confidentiality of Grand Jury proceedings is not overcome by conclusory…