From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Birmingham v. Abrams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

December, 1933.


Order denying motion for a peremptory mandamus order reversed on the law, with costs, and motion granted as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. Under section 78 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the board of trustees of the village of East Rockaway was without power to reduce the salary of the appellant during his present term of office. Chapter 853 of the Laws of 1928 did not, by implication, repeal that section, because section 101 Gen. Constr. of the General Construction Law provides that "The Consolidated Laws shall not be construed to amend, repeal or otherwise affect any provision of the penal law, code of civil procedure or code of criminal procedure unless expressly so stated." Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Amending Village Law, § 184. — [REP.


Summaries of

Matter of Birmingham v. Abrams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Matter of Birmingham v. Abrams

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of EDWARD BIRMINGHAM, Appellant, for a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1933

Citations

240 App. Div. 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Citing Cases

People

Our courts have interpreted, ratified and confirmed the above-declared intention of the Legislature. ( Matter…

Gambino v. City of Peekskill

The plaintiff, as a City Judge under the charter of the City of Peekskill (L. 1938, ch. 194), is not a police…