From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re the Claim of Biot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 2, 1998
249 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 2, 1998

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant left her employment as a cook and clerk at a delicatessen after the employer scheduled claimant to work on a Tuesday evening, notwithstanding the fact that she had not been scheduled for a Tuesday evening in six months. Upon our review of the record, we find that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Absent a compelling reason, dissatisfaction with one's work schedule does not constitute good cause for leaving one's employment (see, Matter of Adams [Hartnett], 174 A.D.2d 951). Although claimant stated that she could not work because she was scheduled to meet with her study group and had an appointment with her therapist on that evening, claimant failed to establish that her refusal to accommodate the employer's schedule was based on any compelling circumstances within the meaning of the Labor Law (see generally, Matter of De Jesus [Hudacs], 210 A.D.2d 716).

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re the Claim of Biot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 2, 1998
249 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

In re the Claim of Biot

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of DEBORAH M. BIOT, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 2, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 632