Summary
In Bervilacqua v. Clark (250 N.Y. 589), the compensation which was upheld for the "loss of a member", an eye, was predicated upon a disability caused thereby.
Summary of this case from Matter of Riegle v. FordonOpinion
Argued March 18, 1929
Decided April 16, 1929
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.
William B. Davis and E.C. Sherwood for appellants.
Hamilton Ward, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the disability caused solely by the accident is due to the loss of a member.
Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ.