From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bell v. Posillico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 30, 1995
213 A.D.2d 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 30, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Harris, J.).


Petitioner challenges respondent's denial of his request for permission to participate in a temporary work release program from prison. Our review of the record reveals, however, that petitioner has failed to establish that respondent's denial violated any laws or deprived petitioner of any constitutional right. Moreover, in light of the serious nature of petitioner's past criminal history, we cannot conclude that the denial of his request was irrational. While petitioner may be eligible for temporary release consideration, he is not conclusively entitled to this privilege.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Bell v. Posillico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 30, 1995
213 A.D.2d 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Bell v. Posillico

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SHERMAN BELL, Appellant, v. LINDA POSILLICO, as Temporary…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 30, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 959 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 977

Citing Cases

Matter of Romer v. Goord

The fact that the petitioner is an eligible inmate does not make him automatically entitled to temporary…

Matter of Kurtish v. Recore

Petitioner was denied participation in the industrial training program because of "the extremely violent…