From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Beisgen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 2000
272 A.D.2d 322 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued March 21, 2000.

May 3, 2000.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Town Board of the Town of Orangetown, dated November 23, 1998, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of misconduct, incompetence, moral turpitude, and insubordination, and terminated his employment.

Hitsman, Hoffman O'Reilly, Elmsford, N.Y. (Doug E. Solomon and John F. O'Reilly of counsel), for petitioner.

James K. Riley, Town Attorney, Orangeburg, N.Y. (Teresa M. Kenny of counsel), for respondents.

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., DANIEL W. JOY, SONDRA MILLER, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION JUDGMENT

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The Hearing Officer's determination that the petitioner was guilty of the charged acts was supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Lahey v. Kelly, 71 N.Y.2d 135; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176; Matter of Ahsaf v. Nyquist, 37 N.Y.2d 182). The penalty imposed, moreover, was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

RITTER, J.P., JOY, S. MILLER and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Beisgen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 2000
272 A.D.2d 322 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Beisgen

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE BEISGEN, petitioner, TOWN OF ORANGETOWN, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 3, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 322 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
714 N.Y.S.2d 677

Citing Cases

Maher v. Cade

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs. The…