From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Bauer v. Bauer's Restaurant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 21, 1966
26 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

October 21, 1966


Appeal by the claimant-widow from a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board denying her death benefits on the ground that her claim was not filed within two years of her husband's death as required by section 28 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law. The claim having been filed more than five years after her husband's death, the sole issue raised is the propriety of the board's determination that her payment of her husband's funeral expenses did not also constitute an advance payment of compensation by her as his employer thus waiving the two-year filing requirement of section 28. This determination is factual and thus if supported by substantial evidence must be sustained. There is in the instant record no evidence that claimant-widow paid the funeral expenses as an employer with recognition that there existed a claim or liability ( Matter of Buxbaum v. Cumberland Provision, 14 A.D.2d 425, app. dsmd. 12 N.Y.2d 670; Matter of Lombardo v. Endicott Johnson Corp., 275 App. Div. 18), and thus the board properly concluded that the natural inference was that she paid "the funeral bill as a widow, not as an alleged employer." Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur; Taylor, J., not voting.


Summaries of

Matter of Bauer v. Bauer's Restaurant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 21, 1966
26 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Matter of Bauer v. Bauer's Restaurant

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of VIRGINIA BAUER, Appellant, v. BAUER'S…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 21, 1966

Citations

26 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Matter of Sommerville v. Sommerville

den. 307 N.Y. 943). While the record does establish that the employer had the same family name as the…